What was Eric Wolf known for?
The Hidden Frontier
Europe and the People Without History
Eric Wolf/Known for
What kind of anthropologist was Eric Wolf?
anthropologist
About Eric’s Work. Eric Wolf was an anthropologist whose work compared and synthesized historical factors and trends across centuries and civilizations. Much of his work focused on how the categories of race, ethnicity, and culture developed over the course of the nineteenth and twentieth-centuries.
What is structural power according to Eric Wolf quizlet?
Eric Wolf 4 Models of Power: Structural Power, to control the settings themselves, to shape the entire social field.
What did Eric Wolf and Sidney Mintz study?
Wolf and Mintz were especially attentive to European imperialism and capitalism. Subsequently, Wolf focused on how his historical, power-oriented perspective applied to ideology and culture.
What did Eric Wolf believe?
In the 1950s, Marxist anthropologists like Eric Wolf suggested that non-Western societies could not be understood without reference to their place within a global capitalist system.
What is structural power anthropology?
Term. structural power. Definition. power that organizes and orchestrates the systemic interaction within and among societies, directing economic and political forces on the one hand and ideological forces that shape public ideas, values, and beliefs on the other. Term.
What are the 4 types of power Eric Wolf?
He distinguishes between four modalities of power: 1. Power inherent in an individual; 2. Power as capacity of ego to impose one’s will on alter; 3. Power as control over the contexts in which people interact; 4.
What is structural power quizlet?
Structural power refers to the ability to shape the frameworks within which global actors relate to one another. Thus affecting ‘how things shall be done’
What are Wolf’s 4 dimensions of power?
Where did Mintz do his fieldwork?
Puerto Rico
Mintz received his PhD at Columbia University in 1951 and conducted his primary fieldwork among sugar-cane workers in Puerto Rico….
| Sidney Mintz | |
|---|---|
| Thesis | Cañamelar: The Contemporary Culture of a Rural Puerto Rican Proletariat (1951) |
| Doctoral advisors | Ruth Benedict • Julian Steward |
Who was Mintz?
Charles Bear Mintz (November 5, 1889 – December 30, 1939) was an American film producer and distributor, who assumed control over Margaret J. Winkler’s Winkler Pictures after marrying her in 1924; the couple had two children, Katherine and William. Between 1925 and 1939, Mintz produced over 370 cartoon shorts.
What are some of the ways in which anthropologists and economists differ in their understandings of economic life?
However, there are several important differences between the two disciplines. Perhaps most importantly, economic anthropology encompasses the production, exchange, consumption, meaning, and uses of both material objects and immaterial services, whereas contemporary economics focuses primarily on market exchanges.
What did Eric Wolf study in Envisioning Power?
In Envisioning Power: Ideologies of Dominance and Crisis, Eric Wolf investigated the history of ideas, power, and culture and how they interact. Wolf argues that power is important in shaping cultural evolution. Ideology incorporates power but ideas reflect cultural input. Belief about power and actual power converge through culture.
What did Eric Wolf contribute to the field of Anthropology?
Wolf’s key contributions to anthropology are related to his focus on issues of power, politics, and colonialism during the 1970s and 1980s when these topics were moving to the center of disciplinary concerns.
Where did Eric Wolf do his field work?
At Columbia he formed part of an important cohort of students of Julian Steward and participated in the People of Puerto Rico field research project. Wolf then conducted a second period of fieldwork, mainly archaeological and ethnohistorical, in Mexico and finally ethnographic fieldwork in the Tyrolean Alps of Italy.
How did Eric Wolf contribute to the Cold War?
In parallel, he experienced the powerful military, political, and ideological systems of World War II and Cold War America. Reflecting on this parallel intellectual and societal history, he developed a forceful critique of the avoidance of power questions by American anthropologists.
